EVALUATION / INTERACTIVE
How to set a Jev confidence gate: coverage and errors on six cases
Use six entirely synthetic tickets to understand the tradeoff, then validate with your own de-identified, human-labeled data. These numbers are not Jev API results and cannot select a production threshold.
These six records teach how metrics change. They cannot establish Jev accuracy, calibration, or an optimal gate.
3 / 6Auto-routed
3 / 6Human review
1 / 3Wrong among auto-routed
50%Auto-routing coverage
Illustrative confidence · ✓ Auto-routed · ○ Human review
- 01Synthetic case 01Human label: shipping · Illustrative prediction: shipping0.94
- 02Synthetic case 02Human label: billing · Illustrative prediction: billing0.89
- 03Synthetic case 03Human label: review · Illustrative prediction: shipping0.83
- 04Synthetic case 04Human label: shipping · Illustrative prediction: shipping0.76
- 05Synthetic case 05Human label: review · Illustrative prediction: billing0.69
- 06Synthetic case 06Human label: review · Illustrative prediction: review0.58
How to evaluate for real
- Write labeling rules for the correct team and whether automation is allowed. Keep ambiguous, multi-intent, and missing-data cases visible.
- Separate threshold-tuning cases from a locked final test set. Choose the gate only on the tuning set.
- Report coverage, wrong auto-routes, costly errors, review rate, failed requests, p50/p95, and total cost together.
- Repeat checks after model, option, or policy changes. Code permissions and human workflows still guard high-impact actions.
Further reading: Datawhale evaluation methods Datawhale Jev Cookbook ↗